‘Certain American States’ by Catherine Lacey – Modern Stories with Some Wicked Twists

 

‘Certain American States’ by Catherine Lacey (2018) – 190 pages

The loneliness of certain American states is enough to kill a person if you look too closely.”

If you are searching for something new and different in fiction, you might try Catherine Lacey. I’m at the point where I would rather read her disordered unpredictable stories in ‘Certain American States’ than the simpler more straightforward sincere stories of someone else. This is my first encounter with Lacey’s work, but it won’t be my last.

It is not that her subject matter is so weird or different. These stories usually start out as direct stories of modern life. Perhaps Lacey describes her subject matter best in her story “Small Differences” with the phrase “the conditional and imperfect nature of human-on-human love,”

It is clear now that Nathan and I have always had just enough respect for each other to withstand a mutual disrespect.”

You only learn who you’ve married after it’s too late, like one of those white mystery taffies you have to eat to find the flavor, and even then, it’s just a guess.”

So what makes Catherine Lacey’s stories so peculiar? It is the outlandish unpredictable twists that occur along the way. None of the stories are written in chronological order but skip around as needed to heighten their impact. Also Lacey writes superb, occasionally extraordinarily long, sentences. These are the kind of sentences and stories you want to read more than once to capture their full meaning. In fact the first sentence in the first story is nearly two pages, nearly perfect except the editor of my edition left out a ‘to’ early in the sentence.

But sometimes Lacey uses short sentences effectively too. Here is a fine example of Catherine Lacey’s unique voice from her story “Because You Have To”. Here is a young woman’s interior monologue to the guy who has recently left her:

You have been calling and hanging up.

I know it’s you. The telephone rings differently when you call.

You can’t tell me I don’t recognize this. You have no idea what I hear, but it is so like you to doubt me, to assume I’m wrong. It is so like you to not be here, and to call as if to point out your absence and to say nothing just to frustrate me.”

A reader can never tell if Catherine Lacey is serious, and it is probably wise for you to assume she is not.

My main complaint with Lacey’s works here is a a lazy one. These stories each contain so much that they are simply exhausting. A reader shouldn’t have to work this hard in order to enjoy a story. These are the kind of stories that you may want to re-read, but that you may also need to reread in case you have missed a key point. Even in the stories that misfired for me there were a sense of humor and plenty of interesting ideas.

I am going to end with a quote about Catherine Lacey’s stories from novelist Anne Enright:

Although Lacey’s work can be sad, it is rarely monotone, never earnest. Her stories are profoundly playful and piercingly good. You don’t have to read them, but you really should.” – Anne Enright, The Guardian

 

 

Grade : A-

 

10 responses to this post.

  1. Yup… “simpler more straightforward sincere stories” don’t often hold much interest for me any more. IMO there are too many books around which are written by someone who has nothing original to say. I do not agree with those who say that ‘everyone has a story to tell’. I would say that not everyone has a story worth telling, or worth the time of those expected to endure it politely. IMO it is narcissism which drives too many novelists today. They think that their love lives, their motherhood, their careers are different and special, when they are not, but they are published because other narcissists want to ‘connect’ with characters.
    Forgive me if I sound brutal. I am feeling liverish. I have just glanced at some consumer reviews of a book which tells a story of people surviving the Siege of Leningrad and I am wondering what kind of shallow person can’t empathize with anything beyond their own complacent existence and sums it up as “awfully dull”.

    Like

    Reply

    • Hi Lisa,
      Interesting. I spend a lot of time reading reviews, etc to figure out what book I’m going to read next. Usually books that were written years ago and have been brought back from obscurity by an enthusiastic reviewer are usually a pretty safe bet. For modern fiction, there are the award winners. I have had good luck with the Goldsmiths Award winners and even their shortlisted fiction. I’ve had much better luck with the Goldsmiths than the Booker. I also read the Goncourt winner frequently. For reviews I like the Guardian, the Washington Post, the New Yorker, the Irish Times, the Scotsman, and the
      Complete Review.
      What I don’t like is when they count the number of positive reviews to determine the quality of a fiction. That means nothing to me.
      Very occasionally the subject of a fiction enters into my decision to read, but only if the word is that it is well-written.

      Like

      Reply

      • Yes, I think that’s a sound approach to take. Obviously some opinions count more than others!
        I add my reviews to Goodreads and follow selected reviewers there because I found some very reliable reviewers there who don’t blog, but (just as I very occasionally look at online newspaper comments and then regret it) I do sometimes look to see why, when a star rating is very different from mine. And I shouldn’t do it, because it usually just makes me cross!

        Like

        Reply

        • Yes, GoodReads is a fine place to get the real opinions about a book, not some author who might be friends with the writer or have the same publisher. I expect even Shakespeare would get some negative reviews at GoodReads. Probably the biggest fault in book reviewing now is that we all too easily praise too many books.

          Liked by 1 person

          Reply

  2. Ah, I think GR is vulnerable (like Trip Advisor) with reviews not to be trusted, but not quite as tainted as Amazon which is notorious for authors trying to rig the ratings. Unless they are accompanied by a thoughtful review from someone who knows what they’re talking about, I generally distrust both the 5-star “honest” reviews written in exchange for a free book and the 1-2 star reviews which tend to be either ignorant or vindictive. It’s mostly when I occasionally stray into bestseller territory that I don’t know any of the reviewers and so come across dubious reviews.

    Liked by 1 person

    Reply

    • Yes, when there is a lot of money and prestige riding on great reviews, there are always someones willing to provide great reviews. That’s why it is so pleasurable and significant for me when a writer who never got much acclaim during their prime finally gets discovered.

      Like

      Reply

  3. I love the quotes you’ve provided Tony – she sounds like my sort of writer. You have a point about having to work hard – there’s a line there isn’t between having to work too hard and not having to work at all.

    Like

    Reply

    • Hi Sue,
      I was going to read Catherine Lacey’s novel ‘The Answer’ but never quite got to it, so I read these stories instead. Catherine Lacey does seem to be unique and profound above the crowd.
      Your point of not working too hard to understand a novel and not working at all seems valid. There are novels that are just too obscure and others that have nothing that is unique.

      Liked by 1 person

      Reply

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d bloggers like this: